Continues imbroglio caused by the crack in the 13 Club, which is reflected in the current negotiations over broadcasting rights for the next Brazilian Championship. Clubs trade their quotas with individual TVs, and many Experts fear that there may be large imbalance between the clubs in the future.
Flamengo just negotiate its right to broadcast with Globo. Despite not having been published values \u200b\u200bof the negotiation, it is speculated that rotates around 120 million dollars per year. Flamengo, Corinthians and other clubs decided to negotiate over its broadcasting rights outside of Club 13, which closed with Rede TV! a collective contract of 516 million. CADE, the body responsible for overseeing these types of negotiations, has said that individual contracts are no legal problem. Some
questions have been raised on account of these facts. First, Rede TV! would have received a tremendous bore. Duck back into the area, bought the rights of the Brazilian Championship at Club 13, and may end up transmitting only half a dozen games without appeal, as each day passes more clubs negotiate their rights outside the collective bargaining agreement. Another issue much debated by sports commentators, is that Flamengo and Corinthians, on receiving 18 percent more than all the other clubs in the contract with Globo, the Brazilian football would be an imbalance, which could become a fight for two or three large teams only, as in Spain and Portugal. And the grace of Brazilian soccer was just the fact that there are at least 10 clubs with a chance of being champions Brazil, not two, as in those countries.
That will happen in Brazil? Maybe yes, maybe not. It has a very important thing that few are mentioning: people defend the market economy, where the most valuable and popular product is the most sought, desired, and therefore gives the most payback. But they ought to defend, then, these laws of the market in all circumstances, even in football. Flamengo and Corinthians are fired, the champions of public hearing and pay-per-view. Football today is business, for good and for ill. It's not fair that they receive more than the others, by giving greater financial return? Or should they give up what they could make on behalf of the collective good? The collective agreement of the Club for all 13 levels down, and the proof is that the contract of Rede TV! is lower than that paid in the Turkish league, for example (see table below ). And look, it will pay 516 million - an increase of 125 percent of what was paid so far (a pittance of $ 230 million). People who advocate collective good, the hold up in all economic sectors, or only disadvantage when their clubs at heart? They find, for example, that the Force India must earn the same as the Ferrari of TV contracts in Formula 1? Or, say, that Ferrari should sell their cars at popular prices, not to harm the Volkswagen? Probably not.
addition, all clubs who are negotiating their rights outside of Club 13 are receiving more. The Guild, for example, may not be earning as much as Flamengo and Corinthians, but is getting double that of the recipient before. In the end, the imminent end of the 13 Club can end up representing freedom of clubs, so they can negotiate their rights in accordance with the actual burden imposed on Brazilian football, which is reflected in the TV audience, the sale of products and attendance at football.
Sources:
http://www.adnews.com.br/midia/114148.html
http://esporte.ig.com. br / Football / Brazilian club + + + less + get + that + the + Turks + of + the + rights tv/n1238169947241.html
http://www.direitoesporteclube.com.br/tag/direito-de -transmission-tv /
http://globoesporte.globo.com/futebol/noticia/2011/04/flamengo-fecha-acordo-de-direitos-de-transmissao-com-rede-globo.html
0 comments:
Post a Comment